Measure Critical Thinking Under Ambiguity
See who verifies, debugs, and thinks independently
Challenge Mode Enabled
GPT can intentionally give wrong suggestions to see if candidates critically evaluate responses instead of blindly accepting them.
- Configurable GPT challenges
- Realistic coding ambiguity
- Simulates on-the-job decision-making
Reasoning Evidence Captured
Every action, verification, and correction is logged, showing how candidates approach problems and make trade-offs.
- Full prompt and action logs
- Highlights verification and debugging
- Shows independent thinking
Insights for Smarter Hiring
Combine coding results with reasoning evidence to confidently identify developers who can handle real-world challenges.
- Clear judgment metrics
- Independence vs over-reliance on AI
- Quick shortlisting based on critical thinking
Smarter Hiring Insights
Combine coding results with reasoning evidence to quickly identify candidates who can handle complex, ambiguous problems.
- Clear judgment metrics
- Compare independence vs AI reliance
- Fast, confident shortlisting
Smarter assessments with Challenge Mode and reasoning evidence
Every candidate action and GPT interaction is logged to show critical thinking under ambiguity.
Identify who verifies, debugs, and evaluates AI suggestions in real-time.
See not just code, but reasoning, iterations, and independence.